data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e14/d5e149bdf5a30c98c258b00fff6dd3725cb471c9" alt="Law Self logo"
Employment
Law: Employee vs. Independent Contractor
In today’s
ever-shifting economy, many job seekers are hesitant to ask too many questions
during the interview process as they don’t want to risk losing an employment
opportunity. However, job seekers may be doing themselves a disservice by not
clarifying whether the position is as an employee or independent contractor.
Whether the prospect will be considered an employee or independent contractor
has numerous impacts on various important employment characteristics, including wages, taxes and withholdings, fringe benefits, behavior and relationships,
schedules, and record keeping.
First, we need
to define employee and independent contractor. Then, we can
examine the important differences between the classifications and the
ramifications that incorrect classifications can have on both the employer and
employee.
Currently, the
federal government has not established a comprehensive statutory scheme to
distinguish between an employee and an independent contractor. Instead,
different agencies define the distinction for their own purposes. According to
the United States’ Small Business Association, an employee is defined as
someone who “performs duties dictated or controlled by others; is given
training for work to be done; and, works for only one employer.”[i] The National Labor Relations Act defines the term “employee”
broadly. Instead of limiting the term “employee,” it includes anyone not
excluded. People excluded as employees include agricultural laborers, those in
domestic service of any family or person at his home, those employed by his or
her parents or spouses and anyone with the status of an independent contractor.[ii]
An “independent
contractor,” on the other hand, is someone who operates under a business name
or under his own name, may have his own employees, may maintain a separate
business checking account, may advertise his business' services, invoices for
work completed, has more than one client, has his own tools and sets his own
hours, and keeps business records. The IRS defines a person as an independent
contractor “if the payer has the right to control or direct only the result of
the work and not what will be done and how it will be done.”[iii]
Some states have
defined these terms and addressed the problematic overlap of definitions by
providing guidance using a classification test.[iv]
For example, in New Mexico, an individual is classified as an independent
contractor if he meets all of the following standards:
(1) he provides
labor or services free from direction and control over the means and manner of
providing the labor or services,
(2) he obtains
business registrations or licenses required by state law or local ordinance;
(3) he provides
labor or services and furnishes the tools or equipment necessary to provide the
labor or services;
(4) he retains the authority to hire and fire
employees to perform the labor or services;
(5) he receives payment for labor or
services…upon completion of the performance of specific portions of a project
or is made on the basis of a periodic retainer; and
(6) he represents to the public that the labor or services are to be provided by an independently established business.[v]
Essentially,
employees get paid for work under direct supervision of an employer, while
independent contractors take on a job for a price, decide how the work will be
done, and decide if it is necessary to hire others to help do the work.
There are many
practical differences between employing an employee and employing an
independent contractor.
Taxes
The issue of withholding taxes is critical
to the dichotomy. It is the responsibility of the employer to withhold an employee’s federal and state income
taxes.[vi]
The employer is also required pay the withheld taxes to the IRS and any
applicable state agencies.[vii] People working as independent contractors, on the other
hand, must pay their own income taxes and the employers (in most cases)
need not withhold taxes.
Social Security and Unemployment
A second distinction between employees
and independent contractors concerns Social Security and unemployment
insurance. In most cases, employers are required to make payments into Social
Security and unemployment insurance on behalf of employees.[viii]
Independent contractors make their own contributions to Social Security.[ix]
An employer also need not purchase unemployment insurance for independent
contractors because the independent contractor is viewed as self-employed.[x]
Healthcare and Retirement Benefits
When employers offer certain retirement
plans, those employers must make the retirement accounts available to all
employees.[xi] Unlike employees,
independent contractors are not due any sort of contribution toward a
retirement plan or account.[xii]
Other fringe benefits, such as health care coverage, vacation time, and sick
leave are similar to retirement plans.[xiii]
These benefits are available to employees under myriads of federal laws and
regulations, but not to independent contractors.[xiv]
The current
patchwork of laws across the United States makes it difficult for individuals
and potential employers to differentiate between independent contractors and
employees. Clarifying this confusion is important because of the harm mistakes
may inflict on both workers and employers.
Some of the
harms that can be caused by incorrect classification include:
·
Employees
may lose employment benefits such as health insurance, sick days, overtime, and
retirement benefits if incorrectly classified
·
Employees
and prospective employees may lose protections afforded under occupational
safety laws and anti-discrimination safeguards
· Competing
businesses and taxpayers may be forced to pay, for example, emergency medical
costs or welfare for uninsured employees who, by right, should have been
covered under employer health insurance plans or unemployment insurance.
Misclassification
also has legal punitive consequences for employers under both federal and state
law. First, if an employer misclassified an individual as an independent
contractor instead of employee the employer may be required to reimburse the
employee for wages that should have been paid under the Fair Labor Standards
Act, including overtime and minimum wage. Second, an employer will have to pay
back taxes and penalties for federal and state income tax withholding that
should have been paid to the government. Third, an employer can be required to
make Social Security and Medicare payments that should have been made. Fourth,
the employer will have to provide the incorrectly classified individual with
employee benefits such as health insurance and retirement benefits.[xv]
Finally, many states now impose criminal penalties such as jail time and fines
upon a business that intentionally misclassifies an individual as an
independent contractor.[xvi]
Although a job
seeker may hesitate to do so, one issue that must be clarified in the hiring
process is whether a prospective worker will become an employee or independent
contractor. Once classified, it is extremely important to understand what that
classification means in terms of pay, taxes, benefits, and scheduling. As
technology continues to advance and more people are able to work on remote and
per-project bases, more people find work that falls in the gray areas between
employee and independent contractor. As such, knowledge of this area and
understanding its importance is more important than ever.
[ii] 29 U.S.C.A. § 152(3)..
[iv] See Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-766(a) (2011); N.J. Stat. Ann. § 34:20-4
(2007); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 181.723 (2014); N.M. Stat. Ann. § 60-13-3.1 (2005).
[v] N.M. Stat. Ann. §
60-13-3.1 (2005).
[vi] Lukens v. Goit,
430 P.2d 607 (Wyo. 1967).
[vii] Id. at 609.
[viii] See U.S. v. Polk, 550 F.2d 566 (9th Cir. 1977); Washington
Recorder Pub. Co. v. Ernst, 91 P.2d 718 (Wash. 1939).
[x] See Taylor v. Horning, 38 N.W.2d 105 (Iowa 1949); Brewer
v. Millich, 276 S.W.2d 12 (Ky. Ct. App. 1955).
[xi] Nationwide Mut.
Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 319 (2005).
[xii] Trustees of
Resilient Floor Decorators Ins. Fund v. A & M Installations, Inc., 395
F.3d 244, 249 (6th Cir. 2005).
[xiii] See Nieves v. Univ. of Puerto Rico, 7 F.3d 270, 278-281 (1st
Cir. 1993); Weber v. Comm'n of the Internal Revenue Serv., 60 F.3d 1104,
1113-1114 (4th Cir. 1995); Messer v. Dep't of Labor & Emp't Sec., 500
So. 2d 1372, 1373 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).
[xiv] Id.
[xvi] Julien Mundele, Not
Everything That Glitters Is Gold, Misclassification of Employees: The Blurred
Line Between Independent Contractors and Employees Under the Major
Classification Tests, 20 Suffolk
J. Trial & App. Adv. 253, (2015).