Child Support-Module 2 of 6
See Also:
Module 2: Child Support
Introduction
to Child Support
All parents have the
obligation to support their children from birth until the child is emancipated.[1] That is such a universal
proposition that it is a standard part of the law in every state. How that
proposition is enforced by law, specifically when the parents are no longer
living together, is the subject of this module.
The key here is that
everything in this field is geared toward the legal concept of “the best
interests of the child.” That is the guiding principle of every legislature,
judge and governmental agency when working in the child-oriented areas of
domestic relations. While some well-off custodial parents may waive child
support, that is generally frowned upon by courts. In fact, waivers of child
support in prenuptial agreements are generally considered to be unenforceable.
Child support is defined as “Court-ordered payments made by one
parent to the other for the support of the couple’s minor children.”[2] Child
support is paid by the parent that the child does not reside with, called the
“non-custodial parent”, to the parent that the child does reside with, who is
called the “custodial parent.” The custodial parent is also often called the
“payee” or “obligee”, while the non-custodial parent is called the “payor” or
“obligor.” Both are also called “parties” to the action.
Child support is
intended to be used for the child’s food, shelter, education, medical needs,
clothing, and other essentials. However, for the most part, child support
payments are undifferentiated monetary payments. One of the aspects of child
support that creates problems between the parties is that the non-custodial
parent has no control over what the custodial parent does with the money once
it is transferred. It is assumed to be put into the pool of money from which
the custodial parent pays the bills as a matter of course. But the
non-custodial parent has little recourse regarding how the money is spent. If
the money is being spent on illegal or addictive activities, the proper
recourse is a motion to change custody or change child support amounts paid,
using that spending pattern as evidence. But the spending in and of itself is
not actionable.
Another aspect of child
support that can create problems is the notion of “in kind” contributions for
the welfare of the child. These are anything that the non-custodial parent
gives to the child, like food, clothing, or even money, that does not
officially go through the child support process and it not paid to the
custodial parent. The only payment of any kind that counts towards a child
support obligation is cash paid by the non-custodial parent to the custodial
parent. In-kind contributions, such as buying the child clothing, do not offset
a child support obligation unless the custodial parent allows it to count
against the child support obligation or unless a formal agreement allows it.
For example, a child support agreement might stipulate that the non-custodial
parent will purchase clothing for the children and that up to $1,000 per year
of such spending counts against child support obligation.
Determining parentage
Child support can only
be assessed against a person who has legally been determined to be the parent
of the child. This can be based on the circumstances of the birth, other
evidence, adoption or affirmation of parentage.
First, if a child is
born to a married couple, and the pregnancy took place during the marriage, the
husband is legally presumed to be the father.[3] This can presumption can
only be overcome with evidence to the contrary (such as a DNA test).
If the couple is not
married, but the father signs paternity papers acknowledging the paternity of
the child, that is legally sufficient. Note that simply putting a name on a birth
certificate is not sufficient to legally establish parentage. However, if the
putative father informally holds himself out to be the child’s father, he may
be barred from denying paternity. This is sometimes known as paternity by
estoppel.
In the case of unmarried
same-sex female parents, where one of the women carries the child, the other
partner would need to sign a parentage agreement and file it with the court to
legally become the parent. For same-sex male partners or females who adopt, each
of the parties would need to sign a parentage agreement.
If there is a dispute about who the father is, an agency and/or court proceeding may be necessary. Relatively simply DNA testing is more than 99.9 percent accurate and can usually be used to conclusively determine parentage.[4]
Determining
Support Amounts
There was a time when
determining child support amounts was more of an art than a science. The judge
would attempt to balance of the needs of the child and the parents and come up
with an amount that was fair to all parties.
Starting in the 1970’s,
though, states started relying on economic and sociological data to formulate
guidelines on the proper child support amounts, using minimum amounts in the
cases of people who are unable to pay or applying various formulas. Today,
every state uses guidelines, determined by state statute and variably based in
each state’s economy. They are set to monthly amounts.
Models for Determining Child Support Amounts
Most states use one of
three models for determining child support obligations:
--the Income Shares Model;
--the Percentage of Income Model; or
--the “Melson Formula”.
All three of these formulas and their variations have
certain things in common. First, all allow the non-custodial parent a “reserve”
of money that is designed to be enough to survive. Next, all these models have
guidelines relating to “imputed income” or “minimum income.” The idea of a
minimum income is applied by courts to a parent who reports little or no income
and is usually comparable to the state or city minimum wage. A parent reporting
no or very little income to the court is treated by the court as if that parent
had a minimum wage job, and then that wage is applied to the formula. The
underlying assumption is that almost everyone is capable of earning minimum
wage if so inclined.
Federal regulations and many states also require that all
child support orders have provisions to cover the children’s medical expenses,
and they all have formulas to make that happen. Most of these state formulas also
have provisions that account for actual expenses as well, including child care
expenses, the acknowledgement of other children not the product of this
relationship and extraordinary expenses of various kinds relating to the
children.
Also note that the formulas that we will focus on are
applied when there are distinct custodial and non-custodial parents. There are
other formulas and models that are applied when there is a shared parenting
agreement or split custody. Some formulas accommodate “extraordinary
visitation”, such as when child visits an out-of-state parent for the summer.
While they arrive at the bottom line in different manners, these approaches
typically lead to similar bottom lines.
Income Shares Model
The Income Shares Model
tries to create a living situation for the child that reflects the income of
both parents. In this model, the child receives the benefit of same percentage
of income that she would have received had the parents continued to live
together. It tries to balance income, expenses, medical costs, and so on, and
can include the cost of education and long-term care for disabled children, or
any other expenses the couple agrees on or are required to be paid under the
law.
This model is determined by totaling the income of the
parents, creating an income ratio of each parent to the total, and then
applying that percentage to the amount for each child on a sliding scale. We
will go over this in detail and look at examples in the last module of this course.
The income shares model is far and away the most popular
model in the US.[5]
Percentage of Income Model
The Percentage of
Income Model only considers the income of the non-custodial parent and sets a
percentage of that income as the child support obligation, though the
percentage varies based on the circumstances. There are two variations of this
model: The Flat Percentage Model,[6] which applies a strict
formula, and the Variable Percentage Model[7], which accommodates
different financial circumstances of the parents on a sliding scale.
The Melson Formula
Back in the days when
each court had a free hand to develop his own child support guidelines, a
Delaware judge named Elwood F. Melson developed a formula which used the basic
principles behind the Income Shares Model and added some other considerations,
including accommodating each parents’ basic needs. Three states have adopted
this formula.[8]
The District of Columbia has developed its own formula, which is based on a percentage of income, reduced by a formula based on the custodial parent’s income.
Enforcement
of Child Support Orders
Each state has a child
support enforcement agency, responsible for collecting and distributing child
support from the non-custodial parent to the custodial parent. The agencies
also track the locations and employment of the parties and are themselves parties
to child support actions. While these agencies are state-bound, they do engage
in helping other states in cross-state enforcement of the laws.
Any
failure to pay the child support payment on time results in an arrearage, which
is the amount owed from the non-custodial parent to the custodial parent
because of non-payment. That amount can be collected in the same ways that
other debts can be collected—by attaching property or wages. For example, the
money can be collected by attaching the wages of the non-custodial parent and
then transferring that money directly to the custodial parent’s bank account.
But there are additional statutes that come
into play with harsher legal penalties for child support arrearages than for
nonpayment of other debts. We will cover those in the fourth module.
Children on public assistance where the non-custodial parent does not pay child support for whatever reason are in a category of their own. If the custodial parent receives public assistance for the child due to the necessity borne of the nonpayment, the non-custodial parent who failed to pay is liable to indemnify the state up to the amount of state assistance.
Changing
or Terminating Child Support Obligations
Change of Circumstances
Either party can move
to change the child support amount by showing a change of circumstances in the
lives of the parties, including the child, although many courts limit the
number of times that motion can be filed and heard (often once a year).
A change of
circumstances can be change of income of any party (which usually must be at
least 10 percent), change in legitimate expenses of any party, change in
visitation hours that effectively change where the child lives or other changes
that definitively affect the lives of the parties.[9] In most courts, a motion
to modify the child support order based on change of circumstances is filed
with the court along with supporting
documentation. The motion is often first heard by a magistrate, who makes a
recommendation to the judge.
Emancipation
The obligation to pay
child support continues until the child dies or reaches the “age of
emancipation.” That age is determined by state statute, and it usually parallels
the time when a person can legally sign a contract.
Emancipation in most
states (33 of them) happens on the child’s 18th birthday.[10] This is called the “age
of majority.” That is the date on which parents are no longer responsible for
their children’s actions. However, some states set the age of majority at 19,
20 or 21, some have various other circumstantial restrictions, and some have
different ages or circumstances for majority and emancipation.
Exceptions to Emancipation
The statutory
exceptions to emancipation at the age of majority are of two varieties: before
or after the child reaches that age.[11]
To be emancipated
before the statutory age of majority, the child must be leading a completely
independent life. That would include active service in the military, marriage,
graduation from high school with a job before the age of majority, proof that
the child is living independently away from the home of the custodial parent,
the child’s deportation, or any other circumstance in which the court decides
that the child is better off being emancipated or in which a court terminates
the parental rights of the non-custodial parents. This category also includes
the death of the child and/or of the non-custodial parent. However, if the
child has a job but remains in the home, that is usually not enough of an
indicator of independence to emancipate the child.
After the child reaches
the statutory age of majority birthday, the presumption is that the child will
be emancipated. However, this can be altered by agreement of the parties or by
statute. For instance, child support could continue through the child’s college
career if the parents agree to that. There are some cases where child support
may continue almost indefinitely, such as when the child has physical or mental
challenges that make it impossible for that child to have an independent life. A
judge may also, for example, determine that based on the family’s lifestyle and
resources, it is reasonable to force the parent to contribute to a college education.
Termination
of Parental Rights
A judge can terminate a
parent’s rights to a child in some extreme circumstances. These include where
the parent is a clear and constant danger to the child through child abuse or
drug addiction or a parent who has completely disappeared from the child’s
life.[12] A motion to terminate
parental rights can come from the other parent or from a social service or
child support agency. Once parental rights are terminated, so are child support
obligations.
Adoption
There are some cases
where a child is adopted by a new parent after the custodial parent remarries.
Adoption of a child by a third party terminates the rights and obligations of
the non-custodial birth parent, and so terminates the child support obligations
of the biological actual parent.[13] The non-custodial parent loses all rights to
and obligations for the child, as an adoption has the same legal affect as if
the child had never been born to the parent who is not a party to the adoption.
Still, adoption does not wipe out the child support arrearages of the
original parent.
By motion of the parties
As in the case of modification
of the child support amount, either party can move to terminate child support
at any time.[14]
Each state handles this differently, but some of the grounds could be that the
custodial parent has remarried and no longer needs the money or that the child
has moved in with the non-custodial parent. Depending on the state, a motion
with the court or filling out an administrative form will trigger an
investigation by the support agency, which will make a determination or
recommendation to the court.
Formally Terminating the Support Obligation
Once a child is
emancipated, the non-custodial parent’s child support obligation is terminated.[15] But that is not
necessarily the end of the story. If there are any child support arrearages at
that point, they still need to be paid, and failure to pay past-due support
even after emancipation will have the same consequences as before emancipation.
Even though the
agreement, applicable statute or court order will contain language indicating
at what point the child is emancipated, the parties will sometimes need to take
steps to legally terminate the financial obligation. Depending on the state,
there may need to be a separate court order terminating the child support, but
it is always incumbent on the parties to at least notify the court and the
appropriate agencies when that time has come. The parties should not count on
the child support agency acting of its own accord to terminate the order and
stop a wage levy on the non-custodial parent. Depending on the state, the
parties will probably need to notify the court and/or the child support agency
that a child is emancipated. At that point, the agency will take the necessary
steps to end the non-custodial parent’s wage attachment. However, this may take
a while, so the best advice is always to file the paperwork with the support
agency several months before the emancipation date.
Next, we will turn to
spousal support, the other important class of monetary obligations that follow
the breakup of a marriage (or, in some cases, of a long-term relationship).
[1] See, for ex. Cal Family Code Sec. 4053: “A parent’s first and principal obligation is to support his or her minor children….”
[5] The states and territories that use this model are: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wyoming, Guam, Virgin Islands.
[6] The states that use this model are: Alaska, Mississippi, Nevada and Wisconsin.
[7] The states that use this model are: Arkansas, North Dakota, and Texas.
[8] Delaware, Hawaii and Montana.
[10] For ex. Florida: F.S. 39.01(12) “‘Child’ or ‘youth’ means any unmarried person under the age of 18 years who has not been emancipated by order of the court.”