data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e14/d5e149bdf5a30c98c258b00fff6dd3725cb471c9" alt="Law Self logo"
Landlord’s
Liability For Injuries to Tenants and Guests
Traditionally,
in the landlord-tenant relationship, a tenant was responsible to maintain,
repair, and keep safe residential premises. A landlord had no duty to make the
premises safe; the rule that carried the day was caveat lessee, or “let the lessee beware.”
Modern rules, however, impose certain obligations
on landlords and failure to live up to these obligations will make landlords
liable for injuries caused to tenants or other injured parties. This shift is
partially a product of the mass movement of rural populations to urban areas, making
tenants a much more substantial population and partly due to shifting ideas in
society from unbridled capitalism of the 1800s to an approach more concerned
about consumers’ rights today.[1]
This presentation will focus on six cases
in which landlords can be held liable for injuries to tenants or other parties
on the premises. A landlord can liable for injuries caused by:
(1) latent defects;
(2) defects in common areas;
(3) public use of premises;
(4) defects in furnished short-term residences;
(5) defects due to negligent repairs; and
(6) landlord’s
failure to effectively repair the premises when he had a legal responsibility
to do so.
Latent Defects
A landlord leasing dwellings and
residential premises to tenants is strictly liable for injuries resulting from
latent defects in the premises that exist at the time a lease is executed.[2] Latent defects are
concealed and dangerous conditions that a landlord knows, or should know, about.
Additionally, they are conditions that would not ordinarily be discovered by a
tenant during a reasonable inspection. Latent defects typically involve faulty
plumbing, malfunctioning electrical wiring and damaged heating and cooling
mechanisms.
The landlord is not liable if the
tenant was aware of the latent defect before the injury,[3] if the defect becomes
obvious (in other words, no longer latent) before the injury and when the
landlord discloses the defect (even if the disclosure was after the lease
commenced).
Common Areas
A landlord may be liable in tort for
injuries caused by conditions in the common areas shared by all tenants in a
building.[4] Landlords typically retain
possession and control of common areas such as stairways, lobbies, halls,
passageways, elevators and similar building facilities that are for the common
use of all tenants, and so must exercise a duty of ordinary care. This duty of
ordinary care means that a landlord must maintain these common areas in a
reasonably safe condition for safe use by all tenants. Liability attaches if
the landlord is negligent in failing to maintain these common areas. It does
not mean that the landlord will be liable for every injury in common areas. For
example, if one tenant drops a banana peel in a stairwell and another slips on
it five minutes later, it’s unlikely that liability will attach since landlords
cannot be expected to inspect their property for safety every five minutes.
However, if the banana peel was sitting there for a week, it’s much more likely
that a court would consider the landlord’s failure to remove the hazard to be
unreasonable and therefore negligent.
Public Use of Premises
If a tenant leases premises for a
public use, such as a fair, athletic event, or concert, a landlord may be
liable for injuries sustained by members of the public visiting the premises
due to the landlord’s inability to keep the premises safe. To be liable, landlords
are liable for injuries if at the time of the lease, the landlord knows or
should know of a dangerous condition and the landlord knows that the tenant intends
to admit members of the public to the premises and nonetheless fails to repair
the condition
Furnished Short-Term
Residences
A landlord who leases a
fully-furnished residence for a short time is liable for tenant injuries which
occurred during this short-term lease. This is a strict duty and a landlord is
liable even if the defect is hidden if the landlord could have discovered the
defect by reasonable inspection and maintenance. The landlord has an
affirmative responsibility to keep these areas safe because a short-term tenant
is unlikely to be able to inspect and discover defects.[5] The classic example here
is the hotel room. The hotel is liable for dangerous conditions that occur in
hotel rooms (or in hotel common areas) that the hotel management reasonably
should have discovered and fixed in the ordinary course of inspection and
maintenance of the premises.
Negligent Landlord Repairs
If
a landlord does make repairs to leased premises, she must do so competently. A
landlord is, therefore, liable for any injuries caused by repairs that are done
negligently. A tenant can recover for his injuries if the repairs resulted in
an increased danger that was unknown to the tenant or if the landlord’s repairs
provided him with a deceptive appearance of safety.[6] [7] For example, if the
landlord undertook to repair faulty wiring in a tenant’s apartment and failed
to properly do so, and such failure caused the fire that damaged the tenant’s
property, the landlord will be liable for the damage even if it was not her
responsibility to fix the wiring in the first place. By undertaking to do so,
the landlord caused the tenant to justifiably rely on the landlord’s work and
may have caused the client to address the problem herself.
This also applies when the landlord
hired an independent contractor to make repairs, and such contractor did so
negligently.
Landlord’s Duty to
Repair
A landlord is not obligated to
repair every defect in leased premises. However, duties to repair may arise by
contract or maybe required by local law. When any such duty does arise, the
landlord must acquit such duty competently. Failure to do so that causes injury
will render the landlord liable for such injuries.
These six scenarios in which the
landlord is liable for injuries allow tenants and guests remedies for injuries
that are the landlord’s fault. They represent a departure from the common law
rule of caveat lessee but are
critical to protect the landlord-tenant relationship that is so ubiquitous in
urban American society today.
[1]
Irma Merrill, Landlord Liability for Crimes Committed by Third Parties Against
Tenants on the Premises, 38 Vand. L. Rev. 431, (1985).
[2]
Becker v. IRM Corp., 38 Cal. 3d 454,
698 P.2d 116, 213 Cal. Rptr. 213, 1985 Cal. LEXIS 270, 48 A.L.R.4th 601, CCH
Prod. Liab. Rep. P10,522 (Cal. Apr. 29, 1985)
[3]
Stephen Maddex, Propst v. McNeill: Arkansas Landlord-Tenant Law, A Time for
Change, 51 Ark. L. Rev. 575, (1998).
[4]
Gradjelick v. Hance, 646 N.W.2d 225
[5]
Ingalls v. Hobbs, 31 N.E. 286 (Mass.
1892); Young v. Povich, 116 A. 26 (Me. 1922).
[6]
True v. Fath Bluegrass Manor Apartment,
358 S.W.3d 23, 25-27 (Ky. Ct. App. 2011).
[7]
Rietze v. Williams, 458 S.W.2d 613,
1970 Ky. LEXIS 179 (Ky. 1970).