data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5e14/d5e149bdf5a30c98c258b00fff6dd3725cb471c9" alt="Law Self logo"
Copyright: What’s
Protectable & What’s Not?
Copyright
laws seek to prevent unauthorized copying of works of authorship and to protect
the fruits of the labor undertaken in developing such works.
We will present an overview of
copyright law, discussing questions such as “What is a copyright?”, “How are
works made protectable by copyright law?” and “What do copyright laws protect
and not protect?”
What is a copyright?
Copyright is one of many intellectual
property rights. Intellectual property rights are rights protected property
interests, even though they are not tangible, like a laptop or house. Other
intellectual property rights include trademarks, patents, and trade secrets.
U.S. copyright laws are codified in Title 17 of the United States Code. In the
U.S., registration of a work is not required to have a valid copyright. Just
producing and committing something to a tangible form automatically gives you
the copyrights to that creation. However, federal registration of a work with
the U.S. Copyright Office, part of the Library of Congress, provides additional
options and protections to the work’s author.
A copyright is a legally-recognized
property right protecting creative, original works that are fixed in a tangible
medium of expression capable of being perceived, reproduced, or otherwise
communicated.[1] For
instance, a songwriter that writes a song can use the Notes app on an iPhone to
type, or “fix,” the lyrics into a format that is “tangible” and easily
reproduced. Otherwise, the lyrics are just an “idea” in someone’s mind and not
easily perceived or reproduced. Likewise, an oil painter “fixes” her work onto
a canvas, a common “medium of expression” for artists, the same way that a 3D
animator might “fix” his short film into a digital file format, another
“medium” that falls within the scope of the Copyright Act.
How are works made
protectable by copyright law?
Original Works &
Creativity
Originality is a key ingredient to the creation of
a copyrightable work that’s eligible for protection. The U.S. Supreme Court
addressed the originality and creativity requirements in the landmark case Feist
Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc.[2]
In that case, the Court stated that “to qualify for copyright protection, a
work must be original to the author.” Continuing, the Court emphasized that the
work must be “independently created by the author” and it must possess “at
least some minimal degree of creativity.”[3]
In Feist,
Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., a telephone company that created a phone
book, sued Feist Publications, Inc., a company specializing in the creation of
phone books, for copying entries from Rural’s phone book. At the time,
copyright law protected works under the “sweat of the brow” doctrine, which
gave copyright protection based on the time and effort put into the creation of
a work, not necessarily based on whether it was original. The Supreme Court
held in favor of Feist Publications saying, “No one may claim originality as to
facts… because facts do not owe their origin to an act of authorship.”[4]
Therefore, “facts are never original” and copyright law does not extend
protections to facts.[5]
The Court went on to declare that the level of creativity required for
copyright is low, and that a work must be original to and independently created
by the author.
Works that contain factual information
may be registered, so long as they have
a level of creativity or original authorship that creates elements eligible for
registration. For example, a newspaper or magazine article may be eligible
for copyright protections, but the protections do not extend to any “news
elements” within the article because the information contained within is merely
information and within the public domain.[6]
Therefore, once an article or newsworthy event is published by the original
publication, other publications may write their own articles or methods of
conveying the same newsworthy information without infringing upon the original
story.
(In an interesting sidelight, the US
Copyright Office recently had to issue a ruling[7]
that a copyrightable work needs to have been created by a human being to be
protected in response to an attempt to copyright selfies taken by a monkey! [8])
Ideas & Non-Fixed
Expressions
Another
key ingredient to a copyright is making sure the work is fixed in a tangible
medium of expression.[9]
If a work is not fixed, it is therefore not protectable under the Copyright
Act.
Examples of works that have NOT been
fixed include:
·
Choreography
that has never been filmed or notated.
·
An
extemporaneous speech that has not been filmed or recorded.
·
A
work communicated solely through conversation or a live broadcast that has not
been filmed, recorded, written, or transcribed.
·
A
dramatic sketch or musical composition improvised or developed from memory that
has not been filmed, recorded, or transcribed.[10]
The Copyright Act specifically targets
“ideas” when providing guidance on exceptions to the protections it offers. “In no case,” states Section 102(b), “does copyright protection for an original
work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of
operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it
is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.”[11]
Examples of such works that are not subject to copyright protection include:
·
The
idea or concept for a work of authorship.
·
The
idea for a character.
·
Business
operations or procedures.
·
Mathematical
principles, formulas, algorithms, or equations.[12]
Due to the nature of Section 102(b),
it’s important for creators in the entertainment and media industries to
understand that sharing an idea for a movie screenplay or television series
with another person or company, especially when it’s not a finalized or
finished product, can make it more difficult to properly protect the work using
copyright laws.
A related concept that’s important to
understand is that titles, names, and short phrases are NOT eligible for
copyright protection.[14]
This is because those types of works do not meet the “minimum amount of
authorship” necessary. Incidentally, trademark law, codified in the U.S. under
the Lanham Act, also does not generally afford protections to titles either.
Trademark protections may be available for series titles, brand and trade
names, slogans or phrases, but not for individual books or song titles. Taylor
Swift made headlines with registration filings for a variety of trademarks
surrounding her 2014 album, 1989, and
its subsequent world tour.[15]
Whether those filings would hold up in court has not yet been tested.
There are a variety of business
decisions to consider when it comes to protecting intellectual property assets.
Therefore, a proper understanding of the similarities and differences between
different types of intellectual property, is important.
For more information about the
registration and various protections available to works under the Copyright
Act, the U.S. Copyright Office provides a free resource called the Compendium
of U.S. Copyright Office Practices available on the Office
website, copyright.gov. Additionally, the Office releases Circulars
and Factsheets which offer further insights divided by specific topics and can
be accessed for free from its website, copyright.gov/circs/.
[1] 17 U.S.C. § 102.
[2] 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
[3] Id. at 345 (citations
omitted).
[4] Id. at 347 (internal citation omitted).
[5] Id. at 356.
[6] International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215, 234
(1918).
[7] U.S. Copyright Office,
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices § 313.2 (3d
ed. 2014).
[8] See Domonoske, Camila. “Monkey Can't Own Copyright To His Selfie,
Federal Judge Says,” NPR, January 7,
2016. Available at: http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/07/462245189/federal-judge-says-monkey-cant-own-copyright-to-his-selfie.
[9] 17 U.S.C. § 102(a).
[11] 17 U.S.C. § 102(b).
[12] Compendium (Third) § 313.3(A).
[13] See Nichols v. Universal Pictures Corp., 45
F.2d 119, 122 (2d Cir. 1930).
[14] U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 34
(2015).
[15] Hodak, Brittany. “Taylor Swift's
New Trademarks: What They Mean (And Don't Mean) For #Swifties,” Forbes, March
15, 2017. Available at:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brittanyhodak/2017/03/15/taylor-swifts-new-trademarks-what-they-mean-and-dont-mean-for-swifties/.