Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
5-COURSE MULTI-PACK $180
10-COURSE MULTI-PACK $300
Accelerated 1-year bachelor's program
Question 1
Jean is arrested by Officer Handleman for putting graffiti on walls around town. When Handleman first puts the cuffs on Jean says "Don't worry, I ain't gonna ask for no attorney. I'm sure you and I can work somethin' out. I know things 'bout stuff goin' on." Handleman simply says "Shut up, would 'ya!" and puts Jean in the car. On the way to the station Jean says "I'm happy to talk to you 'bout bigger fish out there." Handleman repeats his brusque warning. At the station house Handleman reads Jean her rights and hands her a form to sign to acknowledge that she was given her Miranda warning. She then says "I wanna waive my rights." Can she waive her rights at this time?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Even though almost every American could probably quote the Miranda warning we heard on TV, a Miranda waiver won't be effective until a suspect is actually given some form of warning, and 'shut up' is insufficient, so (D) is wrong. Furthermore, while not all rights can be waived (such as the right to a fair and impartial jury of one's peers in the case of a jury trial), the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a right that can be waived (such as the right to a jury trial itself), so (C) is wrong.
Incorrect! Even though almost every American could probably quote the Miranda warning we heard on TV, a Miranda waiver won't be effective until a suspect is actually given some form of warning, and 'shut up' is insufficient, so (D) is wrong. Furthermore, while not all rights can be waived (such as the right to a fair and impartial jury of one's peers in the case of a jury trial), the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a right that can be waived (such as the right to a jury trial itself), so (C) is wrong.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 2
Ron Pardoe is arrested for yelling "Fire!" during a showing of the classic movie "Inferno" in a crowded theater. He is brought to the local police station where he is properly Mirandized and left alone in a room with a "Confession Form." He fills out the form, signs at the bottom, and patiently awaits the officer's return, all the while thinking to himself how unlike the movies the interrogation room looks and wondering why he didn't see any boxes of donuts on the Detective' desks outside. Ron also wonders when they replaced the bare bulb hanging from the ceiling with the long fluorescent bulbs he now sees there. Which of the following statements is most relevant?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct A suspect can waive his Miranda rights through words or actions which evidence an intent to knowingly and voluntarily waive those rights. By signing the form after hearing Miranda warnings, Ron effectively indicated his willingness to waive his Fifth Amendment privileges.
Incorrect! A suspect can waive his Miranda rights through words or actions which evidence an intent to knowingly and voluntarily waive those rights. By signing the form after hearing Miranda warnings, Ron effectively indicated his willingness to waive his Fifth Amendment privileges.
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 3
After signing the "Confession Form" in the question above, Officer Brady enters the interrogation room. "I'm glad you decided to come clean," he says. "Say, you wouldn't know anything about the bag of drugs we found under the seat you had been in at the theater, now, would you?" Ron tells Brady he'd like to remain silent and asks for his lawyer. "I'd be glad to accommodate you sir," says Brady, but by signing this Confession Form you already waived you rights. Too bad, so sad. Now talk!" Is officer Brady right?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct The court in Miranda firmly established that answering some questions (or, in this case, signing a Confession Form) does not waive the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for all future questions, and the privilege may be exercised at an time in regards to future questions. (D) is wrong because a waiver of the privileges does not distinguish between waiving the right for purposes of written or oral questioning.
Incorrect! The court in Miranda firmly established that answering some questions (or, in this case, signing a Confession Form) does not waive the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for all future questions, and the privilege may be exercised at an time in regards to future questions. (D) is wrong because a waiver of the privileges does not distinguish between waiving the right for purposes of written or oral questioning.
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 4
Elaine Marbeck and her sons from East Salem, New York, are once again in trouble with the law over marijuana fields discovered on their extensive property. Elaine and her older sons Mark and Dick are arrested and brought to the police station. Elaine's fifteen year old daughter, Susie, is also arrested. Susie is a good girl who gets straight A's in school and never gets in trouble. There was that one time, in band camp, but that's not really relevant. Elaine is brought into an interrogation room, Mirandized and then asked questions about the marijuana. Tired of going to jail, she decides to keep her mouth shut this time and wait for her lawyer. She does not actually request her lawyer instead, she simply refuses to say a word. When Sheriff Crane realizes that Elaine is unlikely to respond he puts her in a cell across the hall from Susie's. Elaine is alone in her cell. Susie shares her cell with several experienced prostitutes. After a few minutes Elaine is brought back into the interrogation room. She is Mirandized again and says she's willing to confess. She is handed a "Miranda Waiver Form" which she signs, and her confession is then tape recorded. Can the confession be used against her in her trial?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct (C) is wrong because Elaine never asserted her right to have her attorney present, and therefore the Sheriff need not wait for a lawyer to arrive simply because Elaine had fallen silent. Susie's cell conditions, however, seem intentionally designed to convince the mother to answer questions in the hopes of getting her daughter released. Because a Miranda waiver in the face of 'threats, trickery or cajolery' is ineffective, Elaine's statement cannot be use to convict her.
Incorrect! (C) is wrong because Elaine never asserted her right to have her attorney present, and therefore the Sheriff need not wait for a lawyer to arrive simply because Elaine had fallen silent. Susie's cell conditions, however, seem intentionally designed to convince the mother to answer questions in the hopes of getting her daughter released. Because a Miranda waiver in the face of 'threats, trickery or cajolery' is ineffective, Elaine's statement cannot be use to convict her.
Question 5
Dilbert is arrested by Officer Coshon for computer theft. He is brought to the local precinct house and properly Mirandized. He is then left in the general holding pen used for all the precinct's male prisoners for approximately one hour (it's lunch time for Coshon). Also in the cell is a suspected rapist, a suspected drug dealer, and two drunks who got in a fight and are sleeping it off. Dilbert has led a protected life and has never been around any criminal element, "except," he thinks to himself, "those guys I sold the computers to." After about an hour he is brought into an interrogation room, Mirandized again, and asked about the missing computers. He admits to the theft and pleads with the officer to get him out of the holding pen and "away from those bad, bad people." Can the confession be used as evidence against Dilbert in his trial for the theft?
Correct Dilbert was properly Mirandized and waived his rights in the absence of any coercion. Although Dilbert might have been scared in the holding pen, such fear in unavoidable and it is unreasonable to force police to separate suspects and build separate holding cells to suit various needs. Whether or not a Miranda waiver was obtained as the result of coercion will he depend on the totality of the circumstances. Here, Dilbert was not intentionally put in a cell with others who would intimidate him. Rather, he was placed in the only men's holding area. Inevitably, when arrested one will be in close proximity to a 'criminal element,' but Dilbert is an adult and was not left in the cell for an unreasonable amount of time. (B) is wrong because the Fifth Amendment applies to all suspects regardless of the crime with which they are accused, and theft is not a 'white-collar' crime.
Incorrect! Dilbert was properly Mirandized and waived his rights in the absence of any coercion. Although Dilbert might have been scared in the holding pen, such fear in unavoidable and it is unreasonable to force police to separate suspects and build separate holding cells to suit various needs. Whether or not a Miranda waiver was obtained as the result of coercion will he depend on the totality of the circumstances. Here, Dilbert was not intentionally put in a cell with others who would intimidate him. Rather, he was placed in the only men's holding area. Inevitably, when arrested one will be in close proximity to a 'criminal element,' but Dilbert is an adult and was not left in the cell for an unreasonable amount of time. (B) is wrong because the Fifth Amendment applies to all suspects regardless of the crime with which they are accused, and theft is not a 'white-collar' crime.