Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
5-COURSE MULTI-PACK $180
10-COURSE MULTI-PACK $300
Accelerated 1-year bachelor's program
Question 1
The term diversity jurisdiction means:
Correct A federal court has authority to hear cases between citizens of two different states so long as the amount in question is in excess of $75,000.
Incorrect! A federal court has authority to hear cases between citizens of two different states so long as the amount in question is in excess of $75,000.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 2
Fred's friend Barney was recently wrongly fired from his job. Although Barney does not want to sue, Fred hates to see Barney so upset and sues on Barney's behalf. Which of the following is TRUE?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Fred is the wrong plaintiff in this case and has suffered no harm. He therefore lacks standing and there is no real case or controversy until and unless Barney brings suit himself.
Incorrect! Fred is the wrong plaintiff in this case and has suffered no harm. He therefore lacks standing and there is no real case or controversy until and unless Barney brings suit himself.
Question 3
Fred's friend Barney was recently wrongly fired from his job. Barney finally decides to sue his employer for wrongful discharge. Before the case gets to trial his boss apologizes and asks him to return to work with back-pay and a raise. Barney agrees. Which of the following is TRUE?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct In order for there to be a case or controversy, the controversy must be 'live.' Because the controversy here has been resolved, it is no longer appropriate for a court to hear the case, which is now moot.
Incorrect! In order for there to be a case or controversy, the controversy must be 'live.' Because the controversy here has been resolved, it is no longer appropriate for a court to hear the case, which is now moot.
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 4
Fred's friend Barney was recently wrongly fired from his job. Barney finally decides to sue his employer for wrongful discharge. Before the case gets to trial his boss apologizes and asks him to return to work with back-pay and a raise. Barney agrees. On the first day back on the job, Barney hears about a new law from a co-worker. The law apparently requires that everyone on the worksite wash their hands prior to returning to work or be subjected to a $50 fine. Barney has an aversion to washing his hands in public bathrooms, and doesn't much like the idea of paying the fine either. Although he hasn't seen anyone around checking up on whether employees follow the new rule or not, he decides to sue before he gets in trouble for this obviously unconstitutional invasion of his privacy. Which of the following is TRUE?
Correct Unless Barney can show extreme hardship on the absence of pre-enforcement judgment, he will have to wait until the law is enforced before filing suit. Until then, his case is not ripe.
Incorrect! Unless Barney can show extreme hardship on the absence of pre-enforcement judgment, he will have to wait until the law is enforced before filing suit. Until then, his case is not ripe.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 5
Fred is angry about all these suits he and Barney have brought just to get kicked out of court. When the President enters into a treaty with China which results in Fred and Barney's employer going bankrupt, Fred decides to suit and challenge the treaty. He goes through his checklist and determines that he has standing because he has lost his source of income, the case is ripe and circumstances have not rendered it moot. Unfortunately for Fred he is once again turned away practically at the courthouse steps. Why?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct The Political Question Doctrine prevents courts from exercising jurisdiction over purely political issues, and international treaties are by their very nature purely political agreements.
Incorrect! The Political Question Doctrine prevents courts from exercising jurisdiction over purely political issues, and international treaties are by their very nature purely political agreements.