Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
5-COURSE MULTI-PACK $180
10-COURSE MULTI-PACK $300
Accelerated 1-year bachelor's program
Question 1
Frank Curdew in taken in handcuffs to the police station and charged with stealing chickens. He is taken into a room with the words "Interrogation Room" written in large letters across the door. He is told to sit down and wait for an officer to come in, and the door is closed and locked behind him. In the room is a table which contains paper and a pen. After twenty minutes of waiting, Frank decides he might as well get this over with and writes out his confession. Can the confession be used against him at trial?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Mere custody does not satisfy the interrogation requirement in Miranda, and without an interrogation there is no Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Frank is definitely in custody here, as the cuffs and locked door indicate, so (C) is wrong.
Incorrect! Mere custody does not satisfy the interrogation requirement in Miranda, and without an interrogation there is no Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Frank is definitely in custody here, as the cuffs and locked door indicate, so (C) is wrong.
Question 2
In the set of facts above, assume that the paper placed on the table said "Confession Form" at the top. It further reads "I, Frank Curdew, hereby admit my fault and confess to violating U.S.C.A. Section 435.7, theft of poultry and transportation thereof across state lines." After twenty minutes of waiting, as beads of sweat fall from Curdew's face onto the paper, he signs the form and starts pounding on the door "Now let me out you monsters!" Can the confession be used against him at trial?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Although this example comes close to the line, all that is required for an interrogation are some words or actions which are reasonably likely to lead the suspect to make incriminating remarks. Placing the form on the table for Curdew to see is sufficient action to be called a 'interrogation.' A custodial interrogation requires the questioners to provide the suspect with a Miranda warning, and since there was no such warning here the signed confession form is inadmissible against Curdew.
Incorrect! Although this example comes close to the line, all that is required for an interrogation are some words or actions which are reasonably likely to lead the suspect to make incriminating remarks. Placing the form on the table for Curdew to see is sufficient action to be called a 'interrogation.' A custodial interrogation requires the questioners to provide the suspect with a Miranda warning, and since there was no such warning here the signed confession form is inadmissible against Curdew.
Question 3
P. G. Herman is a suspected of various sex crimes. Officer Dirk Diggler follows Herman into an X-rated movie theater and sits down next to him. "I'm Officer Diggler, and I want to know what you've been doing lately, Herman. I know you're up to no good, and that you're a pervert. Come clean, Herman, come clean. Tell me now, Herman. C'mon, let's hear it. Well? How about it?" Diggler continues in this vein for several minutes at which point Herman confesses. Evaluate the following statement: Herman's extrajudicial confession cannot be used against him at his criminal trial because his Fifth Amendment rights would be violated by such use.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Although Diggler's questioning of Herman certainly amounts to an interrogation here, it was not a custodial interrogation. Because only custodial interrogations give rise to Fifth Amendment concerns, Miranda is inapplicable here and the statement can be entered into evidence against Herman.
Incorrect! Although Diggler's questioning of Herman certainly amounts to an interrogation here, it was not a custodial interrogation. Because only custodial interrogations give rise to Fifth Amendment concerns, Miranda is inapplicable here and the statement can be entered into evidence against Herman.
Question 4
P. G. Herman is in trouble again. He has been taken into custody by the L.A.P.D. for stealing newspapers and is sitting in the hallway handcuffed to a bench. Patrolman Peters is just coming into the precinct house at the end of a long, hard shift. Too tired to make it to the locker room, he decides to sit on the hallway bench and catch his breath. Noticing Herman, he asks "Hey, didn't I see you soliciting prostitution the other night?" Herman replies "Were you in that patrol car? Yeah, that was me. Couldn't agree on a price, though, so I went home alone." Can Herman's confession to Peters be used against him at his criminal trial?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Regardless of the capacity in which Peters was asking the question, he questioned a suspect while that suspect was in custody, making it a custodial interrogation covered by Miranda. Without a Miranda warning and waiver, Herman's confession cannot be used against him. Note that (B) incorrectly focuses on the casual nature of Peters' remarks. Because any question likely to elicit an incriminating remark can qualify as an interrogation for Miranda purposes, the casual nature of the remark is irrelevant.
Incorrect! Regardless of the capacity in which Peters was asking the question, he questioned a suspect while that suspect was in custody, making it a custodial interrogation covered by Miranda. Without a Miranda warning and waiver, Herman's confession cannot be used against him. Note that (B) incorrectly focuses on the casual nature of Peters' remarks. Because any question likely to elicit an incriminating remark can qualify as an interrogation for Miranda purposes, the casual nature of the remark is irrelevant.