TAKE COLLEGE-LEVEL COURSES WITH
LAWSHELF FOR ONLY $20 A CREDIT!

LawShelf courses have been evaluated and recommended for college credit by the National College Credit Recommendation Service (NCCRS), and may be eligible to transfer to over 1,300 colleges and universities.

We also have established a growing list of partner colleges that guarantee LawShelf credit transfers, including Excelsior University, Thomas Edison State University, University of Maryland Global Campus, Purdue University Global, and Southern New Hampshire University.

Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
5-COURSE
MULTI-PACK
$180
10-COURSE
MULTI-PACK
$300
Accelerated
1-year bachelor's
program

Question 1

New York City owns Madison Square Garden. The City rents out Madison Square Garden to "Save Saddam," a pacifist organization so that they can hold a massive demonstration against American troop deployment in Iraq. Must New York City actually grant "Save Saddam" actual right to possess and use the Garden?

Question 2

New York City owns Madison Square Garden. The City rents out Madison Square Garden to "Save Saddam," a pacifist organization so that they can hold a massive demonstration against American troop deployment in Iraq. NYC gives "Save Saddam" the right to use Madison Square Garden. However, when the organization tries to use the Garden to hold its rally, it finds that another organization, called "Get Saddam," has entered and taken over the Garden and will not leave. Is New York City responsible for bringing an ejectment action against "Get Saddam" so that the tenants can enjoy their right of possession?

Question 3

Larry owns an apartment building in which Moe rents an apartment on the 31st floor. One day, the elevator in the building breaks and Larry refuses to fix it. Moe complains about the broken elevator consistently, but he continues to live in the apartment, and uses the stairs whenever he wants to get up and down to or from his apartment. Finally, Moe stops paying rent. When Larry sues for the rent, Moe claims that Larry has constructively evicted him. Is Moe correct?

Question 4

Larry owns an apartment building in which Moe rents an apartment on the 31st floor. One day, the elevator in the building breaks and Larry refuses to fix it. Under the housing code in Larry's state, a landlord must keep the elevators working properly in any building more than 5 stories tall. Moe complains to the local zoning board about the broken elevator. Larry promptly evicts Moe after giving him proper notice and allowing the notice requirement time period to elapse. Does Moe have an action against Larry for wrongful eviction?