Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
5-COURSE MULTI-PACK $180
10-COURSE MULTI-PACK $300
Accelerated 1-year bachelor's program
Question 1
Tommy is a resident of Utah and a practicing Mormon. Although he is already married with three children, he has an interest in marrying the 17-year-old daughter of his best friend for religious reasons. When he goes to apply for a marriage license for his second wedding, he will have no problem getting the license.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct Having more than one wife or husband at the same time-polygamy or bigamy-is not permitted in all states, despite Tommy's assertion that the second wedding would be for religious reasons. Although the Constitution recognizes one's right to religious freedom, states still have the right to regulate marriage and specifically outlaw multiple simultaneous marriages.
Incorrect! Having more than one wife or husband at the same time-polygamy or bigamy-is not permitted in all states, despite Tommy's assertion that the second wedding would be for religious reasons. Although the Constitution recognizes one's right to religious freedom, states still have the right to regulate marriage and specifically outlaw multiple simultaneous marriages.
Question 2
Francine lives with her daughter and two grandsons. Recently, the city where they live passed an ordinance that made it illegal for extended families to live in the same household. If Francine sues to maintain her current living arrangement, which law will govern the court's decision?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct The U.S. Supreme Court in Moore v. City of East Cleveland, interpreting the U.S. Constitution, struck down a similar local ordinance that disallowed extended family members from living together in a single family home. Since a Supreme Court decision is the law for the entire land, this ruling would trump the local zoning ordinance.
Incorrect! The U.S. Supreme Court in Moore v. City of East Cleveland, interpreting the U.S. Constitution, struck down a similar local ordinance that disallowed extended family members from living together in a single family home. Since a Supreme Court decision is the law for the entire land, this ruling would trump the local zoning ordinance.
Correct
Incorrect!
Question 3
Shawn and Maria live in a small town in Texas. They want to get married and go to their local clerk to apply for a marriage license. The clerk refuses to grant them a license because the city where they live objects to their type of proposed marriage Shawn is Asian and Maria is Hispanic. Since marriage is regulated on a local level, the clerk in their small town can derail their marriage plans.
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct The U.S. Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia struck down a law in Virginia that banned interracial marriage. Since this ruling trumps any local regulation, the actions of the clerk in that small town in Texas are illegal.
Incorrect! The U.S. Supreme Court in Loving v. Virginia struck down a law in Virginia that banned interracial marriage. Since this ruling trumps any local regulation, the actions of the clerk in that small town in Texas are illegal.
Question 4
When the U.S. Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972) stated: A "right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person . . . what right were they referring to?
Correct
Incorrect!
Correct The court in Eisenstadt defined the right to privacy of a married couple, free from outside interference.
Incorrect! The court in Eisenstadt defined the right to privacy of a married couple, free from outside interference.