Overview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act - Module 1 of 5
See Also:
Module
1-Overview of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
A
pension plan is a type of retirement plan that requires an employee to make regular
contributions while her employer may match or also contribute.[1] The federal government
incentivizes private employers to provide these plans by offering tax
deductions for employer contributions to qualified plans.[2] Moreover, an employee can
avoid paying taxes on deferred compensation until the plan benefits are paid out.
The
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, which we will refer to as ERISA,
“is a federal law that sets minimum standards for most voluntarily-established
pension and health plans.”[3] It “was enacted because
existing state and federal laws didn’t adequately protect employee benefit plan
participants and beneficiaries.”[4] ERISA requires increased
disclosure and reporting to plan participants, mandates that those who are entrusted
with retirement assets follow a certain level of care and creates remedies for
participants whose protections are violated.[5]
In our first module, we’ll examine ERISA’s basic principles. We’ll explain the purpose behind the law, what ERISA covers and ERISA-mandated responsibilities for plan administrators and sponsors.
ERISA’s
History and Purpose
American Express established the first corporate pension in the
United States in 1875, and banking and rail companies followed suit.[6] Early
pensions were viewed as an employer’s gift to employees for their service
rather than legally protected compensation.[7] Many times, pensions
didn’t vest, so when an employee changed or lost his job, they would lose their
entire pensions.[8]
Private-sector
pension plans gained popularity after World War II, and labor unions started
demanding such plans alongside demands for higher wages. However, the companies
that established those plans didn’t always properly fund them and many
employees were left without promised benefits when those companies failed or
filed for bankruptcy.[9]
With
this rise of private pension plans, the federal government became more active in
its oversight. Congress passed the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act
in 1958. Though the Act was limited in scope, it required covered employers to
file plan descriptions and annual financial reports with the federal government
and to make such documents available to plan participants and beneficiaries.[10]
Public
scrutiny of employer plan management reached a high point in 1963 when
automotive manufacturer Studebaker Corporation shut down. The company’s pension
plan was so underfunded that more than 4,000 workers at its South Bend, Indiana,
plant lost much of their promised benefits.[11] After that, the United
Auto Workers union, representing workers at Studebaker, started lobbying for
federal pension insurance and increased regulation.[12]
On Capitol Hill, Senator Jacob K. Javits became the leading
voice for pension reform. Considered the “grandfather of ERISA,”[13] Javits was
ERISA’s main author.[14] In
1967, Javits introduced the first comprehensive private pension reform bill.
Over the next decade, congressional emphasis on the need for comprehensive
pension plan reform grew. ERISA was signed into law in 1974 and since then, ERISA
has been amended several times to meet “the changing needs of America’s workers
and their families.”[15]
ERISA
does not require an employer to provide any employee benefits. Likewise, it
doesn’t require that a plan provide a minimum level of benefits, so an employer
is free to design its own plan or to not offer one at all.[16] However, once an employer
does decide to provide benefits that are subject to ERISA, the law regulates the
plan’s operation and benefits.
ERISA’s essential objective is to protect employee pension rights from mismanagement and abuse. It achieves this objective by:
· requiring plan sponsors to provide certain information to participants;
· establishing standards of conduct for plan managers and other fiduciaries;
· establishing enforcement provisions that are designed to protect plan funds and ensure that participants receive their benefits; and
· giving participants the right to sue for benefits and fiduciary violations.
ERISA requires a plan sponsor and administrator, typically the employer, to act in the best interest of plan participants and requires the plan administrator to allow participants to access important information about their plans. By allowing access to this information, participants can understand the benefits to which they are entitled. Furthermore, an employer must ensure that service providers for pension plans charge only “reasonable” fees for recordkeeping, investment management and other plan maintenance activities. Finally, a plan’s sponsors must follow and consistently apply the terms described in the documents that govern the plan.
ERISA
Terminology
We’ll
begin with plan terminology. A participant
is an employee who contributes to and/or is eligible to receive benefits from
an employer-sponsored plan. A beneficiary
is a person designated by the participant or the plan who is or may become
eligible to receive benefits. A plan
sponsor is the employer, labor union or other professional organization
that sets up the benefit plan. A plan
administrator is generally responsible for the day-to-day management of the
plan and ensuring that it complies with ERISA regulations.
A plan
sponsor must provide participants with a written plan document, called a Summary Plan Description. This document
provides detailed information about the plan’s features and describes benefits,
rights and obligations in plain language.[17] Certain events and dates trigger
the obligation to provide participants with copies of the summary plan
description. A trustee holds the
investment assets in a trust for employees. An investment manager has the power to manage, acquire or dispose of
plan assets.
Retirement
Benefits Plans
ERISA
covers two types of retirement plans: defined
benefit plans and defined contribution
plans.[18]
A defined benefit plan was traditionally referred to as a “pension.”[19] Typically, an employer
funds the plan and invests contributions on the employee’s behalf. The employee
must work for the employer for a set time, such as five years, to be fully
“vested” in the plan.[20] When the employee
retires, she’ll receive a set monthly amount so long as she satisfies
eligibility requirements. The amount the employee receives during retirement
may be a specific dollar amount or an amount based on a formula that factors in
the employee’s salary and duration of service,[21] with the latter being
more common.
In a defined contribution plan, the employer
or the employee, or both, make fixed contributions to the employee’s retirement
fund. For example, an employee might contribute six percent of his salary to a
defined contribution plan each pay period and the employer may contribute an
additional three percent to the employee’s account. Common defined contribution
plans include 401(k), employee stock ownership and profit-sharing plans.[22] These plans may be less
risky for an employer than defined benefit plans for a variety of reasons,
particularly because the employee bears the investment risks.[23] Employees may also like
these plans because employees have control over the investments and can
generally take their plans from one employer to the next.[24]
Welfare
Plans
ERISA
also covers welfare benefits, which include almost all the other typical
employment benefits, such as health insurance, life insurance, long-term
disability insurance and accident benefits plans.”[25]
People
who manage welfare plans must meet certain standards of conduct. As with
retirement plans, welfare plan fiduciaries must run the plan in the best interests
of participants and beneficiaries. Plans must be run for the exclusive purpose
of providing benefits and paying plan expenses.
It is
important to note that there are some exemptions and safe harbors that carve
out welfare plans that might otherwise be subject to ERISA.[26] For example, under the
“payroll practice” exemption, certain health and welfare payments are exempt
from ERISA if they are made as part of the employer’s normal payroll
practices. Wages, vacation and holiday pay and paid sick leave are examples
of benefits that may qualify under this exemption. Additionally, some programs
that allow employees to make payments via payroll deductions for voluntary insurance policies may fall outside of
ERISA’s purview.
Multiemployer
Plans
Multiemployer plans are established through collective bargaining agreements with labor unions and cover workers at multiple companies, typically within one industry. Participating employees are usually members of the same craft or trade and may work in industries comprised of many small employers or in industries where seasonal, mobile or irregular work is common.[27] A multiemployer plan can be a retirement or a welfare plan.
ERISA’s
Structure and Application
Although
ERISA covers nearly all plans offered by private employers, including
corporations, partnerships, sole proprietorships, and nonprofit organizations,
it does not apply to plans sponsored by state or federal government or
established and maintained by churches or other religious establishments for
their employees. These plans are instead subject to regulation under the
Internal Revenue Code, which provides requirements that allow them to keep
tax-exempt status. State pension plans are primarily governed by state
constitutions, statutes and case law.[28]
ERISA
also doesn’t apply to plans that are maintained only to comply with state laws,
such as unemployment compensation, workers’ compensation and disability
insurance.[29]
Finally, ERISA doesn’t apply to plans that are maintained outside of the United
States for nonresident aliens.
ERISA
is a broad and complex law that is divided into four titles and has shared
oversight among three federal agencies: The Department of Labor, the Internal
Revenue Service and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.[30]
ERISA’s
Title I spells out reporting and disclosure, vesting, participation, funding,
fiduciary conduct and civil enforcement.[31] The Department of Labor’s
Employee Benefits Security
Administration is responsible for administering this part. It is
responsible for enforcement and provides compliance assistance and assists and
educates plan participants and beneficiaries.[32]
Title II amended the Internal Revenue Code to
parallel many of the Title I rules and is administered by the IRS. Title III
covers jurisdictional matters and addresses coordination of enforcement
and regulatory activities by the Department of Labor and the IRS. Title IV
covers insurance for defined benefit pension plans and is administered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.[33] The
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is a federal agency that insures
participant benefits, guaranteeing basic benefits if an employer-sponsored plan
becomes insolvent.
Preemption
“ERISA
supersedes state laws relating to employee benefit plans except for certain
matters such as state insurance, banking and securities laws and divorce
property settlement orders by state courts.”[34] This means that a state cannot
pass laws that interfere with ERISA and that federal law will supersede state
law when there is a conflict between the two.[35]
However, ERISA provides that it does not “exempt or relieve
any person from any law of any State which regulates
insurance, banking, or securities.” This “savings
clause” is important because states have historically regulated the
insurance industry. ERISA’s “deemer clause,” though, clarifies that
no employee benefit plan shall be deemed to be an insurance company, bank,
trust company or investment company for the purpose of state regulation.[36] As
such, it preserved the primacy of ERISA in dealing with employee benefit plans.
Though detailed, ERISA’s broad preemption clause is a source of confusion and its scope has been heavily litigated throughout the years.[37] For example, the Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that pension plans established and maintained by religiously affiliated nonprofit organizations—like those offered by certain hospitals and schools—can qualify as exempt church plans.[38] This issue had been the source of several class-action lawsuits in recent years.[39]
Duties
under ERISA
Since ERISA
establishes transparency and accountability for employee benefit plans,[40] a key element of
compliance for plan sponsors and administrators is to follow detailed notice
and disclosure procedures. For example, participants must have access to
information about their plans and any associated fees or changes in benefits.
There are many reporting and disclosure requirements, but the following is a
brief summary of two critical documents.
Form
5500
ERISA-governed
retirement and welfare plan sponsors must each file a Form 5500 with the
federal government annually. This is a public document that plan participants
can review to learn about the plan’s compliance and performance and that
government agencies can use to collect and study data. The data collected in
this way can be used by federal agencies to craft policy and enforcement decisions.[41]
Notification
of Benefit Determination
Plan
participants must receive notification when a benefit claim has been approved
or denied. A notice of claim denial must state the reasons for the denial and
provide information about the appeals procedure.
Fiduciary Duties
ERISA sets fiduciary standards that require employee
benefit plan funds to be handled prudently and in the best interests of the
participants. A person associated with a plan is a “fiduciary” if he exercises
any discretionary authority or control over the management of the plan or
disposition of plan assets, renders investment advice for a fee or other compensation
with respect to any plan asset or has any discretionary responsibility in the
administration of the plan.[42]
Trustees,
administrators and members of a plan's investment committee are examples of
those with fiduciary duties.
Compliance with ERISA’s many requirements can be
daunting for a fiduciary, but failure to comply can result in significant
penalties.[43] In addition to hefty
monetary fines, fiduciaries may face criminal charges for serious offenses,
such as embezzlement or accepting kickbacks.[44]
Thus, it is critical for fiduciaries to understand their obligations and to
carefully follow their reporting and disclosure requirements and their
fiduciary duties.
There are four duties that a
fiduciary owes to plan participants and beneficiaries. The first is a duty of loyalty, which requires a
fiduciary to discharge his duties “solely in the interest of the participants
and beneficiaries” and for the “exclusive purpose” of providing benefits to
participants and beneficiaries.[45] Second is a duty of prudence, which means that a
fiduciary must make any decision impacting a plan with the care, skill,
prudence and diligence that a sensible person would use under the
circumstances. Third, there is a duty to
diversity investments of plan assets “so as to minimize the risk of large losses,
unless under the circumstances it is clearly prudent not to do so.”[46] Finally, a fiduciary has
a duty to act in accordance with plan
documents, which means that he must comply with the terms of writings that
have a substantive effect on a plan, including collecting and preserving bargaining
agreements and memoranda regarding the sale of plan assets.[47]
In our second module, we’ll analyze
the treatment of qualified retirement plans under ERISA and we’ll learn more
about the types of retirement plans that ERISA covers.
[1] Miriam Caldwell, “What Is a Pension Plan and Should I Have One?,” The Balance, (May 8, 2018), https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-a-pension-plan-2385771.
[2] Patrick Purcell & Jennifer Staman, “Summary of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),” Cornell University IRL School, (April 2008), https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1510&context=key_workplace.
[3] “Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),” U.S. Dep’t of Labor,https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/retirement/erisa
[4] Albert Feuer, “When Do State Laws Determine ERISA Plan Benefit Rights?,” 47 J.Marshall L. Rev. 145, 154 (2014).
[5] C. Scott Pryor, “Rock, Scissors, Paper: ERISA, the Bankruptcy Code and State Exemption Laws for Individual Retirement Accounts,” 77 Am. Bankr. L.J. 65, 65
[6] Melissa Phipps, “The History of the Pension Plan,” The Balance (Aug. 21, 2018), https://www.thebalance.com/the-history-of-the-pension-plan-2894374.
[7] Patrick Purcell & Jennifer Staman, “Summary of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),” Cornell University IRL School, (April 2008), https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1510&context=key_workplace.
[8] Joshua Gotbaum, “ERISA @ 40: A Midlife Crisis,” Brookings, (Oct. 29, 2014), https://www.brookings.edu/articles/erisa-40-a-midlife-crisis/.
[9] Roger Lowenstein, “The End of Pensions,” N.Y. Times, (Oct. 30, 2005), https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/the-end-of-pensions.html.
[10] “History of EBSA and ERISA,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/about-us/history-of-ebsa-and-erisa
[11] “History of PBGC,” Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, https://www.pbgc.gov/about/who-we-are/pg/history-of-pbgc
[12] Roger Lowenstein, “The End of Pensions,” N.Y. Times, (Oct. 30, 2005), https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/the-end-of-pensions.html.
[13] “ERISA 40 Timeline Alternate,” U.S. Dep’t of Labor, https://www.dol.gov/featured/erisa40/timeline/alternative
[14] “P&I at 30 – The Difference Makers, Jacob K. Javits,” Pensions & Investments, (Oct. 27, 2003), http://www.pionline.com/article/20031027/PRINT/310270749/jacob-k-javits.
[15] “Fact Sheet: What is ERISA,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/fact-sheets/what-is-erisa
[17] "ERISA Reporting & Disclosure Requirements,” HG.org, https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/erisa-reporting-and-disclosure-requirements-19550
[18] "Types of Retirement Plans,” U.S. Dep’t of Labor, https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/retirement/typesofplans
[19] “What is the Difference Between a Defined Benefit Plan and a Defined Contribution Plan,” Time.com,
[20] Id.
[21] "Types of Retirement Plans,” U.S. Dep’t of Labor, https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/retirement/typesofplans
[22] Id.
[23] “Defined Contribution Plan,” Investor.gov, https://www.investor.gov/additional-resources/general-resources/glossary/defined-contribution-plan
[24] Id.
[25] "ERISA & Disability Benefits Newsletter,” Eric Buchanan and Associates, (June 2016), http://www.buchanandisability.com/wp-content/uploads/ERISA-Disability-Benefits-Newsletter-Volume-8-Issue-3.pdf.
[26] “ERISA Plan,” TASC, https://www.tasconline.com/biz-resource-center/plans/erisa-plan/ (Sept. 9, 2018).
[28] “Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),” U.S. Dep’t of Labor, https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/retirement/erisa
[30] Samuel Henson, "ERISA’s Three-Headed Guardian,” Locton.com,
http://www.lockton.com/Resource_/PageResource/MKT/ERISAsThreeHeadedGuardian_111.pdf
[31] "History of EBSA and ERISA,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/about-us/history-of-ebsa-and-erisa
[32] “What We Do,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/about-us/what-we-do
[33] "History of EBSA and ERISA,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/about-us/history-of-ebsa-and-erisa; “What is the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)?” Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, https://www.pbgc.gov/about/faq/pg/general-faqs-about-pbgc (Sept. 9, 2018).
[34] Patrick Purcell & Jennifer Staman, “Summary of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA),” Congressional Research Service (April 2008),http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/505/.
[35] "Preemption Law and Legal Definition," U.S. Legal, https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/preemption/
[37] Paul J. Ondrasik, Eric G. Serron, & Edward T. Veal, “ERISA Preemption is Alive and Well,” Steptoe, (April 5, 2016), https://www.steptoe.com/en/news-publications/erisa-preemption-is-alive-and-well.html.
[39] Lisa Nagele-Piazza, “Are Religiously Affiliated Hospitals’ Pension Plan Exempt From ERISA?,” Society for Human Resource Management, (April 5, 2017), https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/are-religiously-affiliated-hospitals-exempt-church-plans-under-erisa.aspx.
[40] “Fact Sheet: What is ERISA?” Employee Benefits Security Administration,https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/fact-sheets/what-is-erisa
[41] “Form 5500 Series,” Employee Benefits Security Administration, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/employers-and-advisers/plan-administration-and-compliance/reporting-and-filing/form-5500
[43] Christina M. Crockett, “Compliance Hurts, but ERISA & IRS Penalties Will Hurt Even Worse,” Benefits Pro, (April 10, 2018), https://www.benefitspro.com/2018/04/10/compliance-hurts-erisa-and-irs-penalties-will-hurt/?slreturn=20180709135524
[47] George A. Norwood, “Who Is Entitled to Receive a Deceased Participant’s ERISA Retirement Plan Benefits - an Ex-Spouse or Current Spouse? The Federal Circuits Have an Irreconcilable Conflict”, 33 Gonz. L. Rev. 61, 75 (1997-1998).