LawShelf courses have been evaluated and recommended for college credit by the National College Credit Recommendation Service (NCCRS), and may be transferred to over 1,500 colleges and universities.

We also have established a growing list of partner colleges that guarantee LawShelf credit transfers, including Excelsior College, Thomas Edison State University, University of Maryland Global Campus, Purdue University Global, and Southern New Hampshire University.

Purchase a course multi-pack for yourself or a friend and save up to 50%!
1-year bachelor's

Republications and Codicils

See Also:

Related Videos:


The re-execution or reestablishment by a testator of a will which had been previously revoked. Also, a second publication of a will that is still valid.

A supplement or an addition to a will; it may explain, modify, add to, subtract from, qualify, alter or revoke provisions of an existing will.

A will may be revived if the testator revokes the will he no longer wants to be his will and republishes the old will either by re-execution or by codicil.

Dependent relative revocation (“DRR”):
A doctrine which regards as mutually dependent the acts of a testator destroying an old will, based on some mistaken belief, and substituting a new will, believing that the second will effectively carries out testator’s wishes. If the second will is deemed ineffective, the first will remains in force.

Sometimes, although a testator revoked a later will, he or she may wish to revive it, thereby revoking the second will. The early common law rule (still followed by some states), allowed the revival of the first will following the destruction of the second will.

Most states today, however, reject the common law rule. Instead, in order for a revoked will to become operative again, it must be republished either by re-execution or a codicil conforming to the doctrine of republication by codicil.

Another method to disregard a mistakenly revoked will is by dependent relative revocation (“DRR”). This is an equity-type doctrine under which a court determines that the act of revocation was premised on a mistake of law or fact. As such, the revocation would not have occurred but for the testator’s mistaken belief that another disposition of the property was valid. If the presupposed disposition is ineffective, the previously revoked will remains in force. See, e.g., Carter v. First United Methodist Church, 271 S.E.2d 493 (Ga. 1980); Chambers v. Chambers, 542 S.W.2d 901 (Tex. 1976).

Like a will, a codicil is a testamentary instrument, but executed after the will, that alters, modifies or expands the provisions in the will. It too must be executed with the same formalities as the will. See, e.g., Leggett v. Rose, 776 F. Supp. 229 (E.D.N.C. 1991); In re Robert’s Estate, 437 N.E.2d 1205 (Ohio 1980). The codicil can be a separate piece of paper or follow the document it amends.

EXAMPLE: Sandy executed a will two years ago. Subsequently, she wanted to add a bequest for her niece, Jane. Accordingly, on a separate piece of paper, she handwrote “I hereby bequeath to my niece, Jane, if she survives me, $2,000.” Additionally, Sandy signed and dated the addition. In jurisdictions that recognize holographic testamentary instruments, this is a valid holographic codicil to the will.

In addition to modifying the will, a codicil may perform other functions:

  1. it may republish a prior valid will;
  2. it may incorporate by reference and thus validate a prior invalid will; or
  3. it may revive a previously revoked will that is still in existence.

In the last two chapters we delved into the requirements for executing a will, including various components and construction details. Next, we will put the will to the test. The next chapter will cover what is involved in estate administration, including what happens if the will is challenged.

Related Videos: